tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1746745451277571533.post495503036401716644..comments2024-02-17T12:36:21.608+05:30Comments on Computers, Technology, and Anything in Between: quirk of static linkingosgeekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12045857609474816436noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1746745451277571533.post-20804904445852966682007-05-20T06:07:00.000+05:302007-05-20T06:07:00.000+05:30No, I didn't. D'oh.No, I didn't. D'oh.qu1j0t3https://www.blogger.com/profile/16041515498065869604noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1746745451277571533.post-75744820790731439942007-05-19T04:04:00.000+05:302007-05-19T04:04:00.000+05:30Did you try linking to a static library?The explan...Did you try linking to a static library?<BR/>The explanation will be in the next post :-)osgeekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12045857609474816436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1746745451277571533.post-20733979273909951902007-05-19T03:47:00.000+05:302007-05-19T03:47:00.000+05:30Yes, that's what the option does. But I thought yo...Yes, that's what the option does. But I thought you were going to tell us why <B>cc -o foo foo.c -lthing</B> and not <B>cc -lthing -o foo foo.c </B> (which work identically for me (gcc)).qu1j0t3https://www.blogger.com/profile/16041515498065869604noreply@blogger.com